Media Nation has moved!

You should be automatically redirected in 6 seconds. If not, visit
http://www.dankennedy.net
and update your bookmarks.

Wednesday, November 22, 2006

McNamara's schadenfreude

Every writer, before he dies, should have a chance to whack an editor or a publisher who's tormented him the way Boston Globe columnist Eileen McNamara gets to do today with would-be O.J. Simpson enabler Judith Regan.

Regan, it turns out, rejected a book proposal McNamara brought to her some years ago because it had too much substance and not enough sex. The book, "Breakdown: Sex, Suicide and the Harvard Psychiatrist," was eventually bought by another publishing house, where it suffered the fate of 99 percent of books.

McNamara gets her revenge today, from the headline, "A vulture gets plucked," to the ending:
As Regan predicted, my book made a quick trip to the remainder table, but Regan developed an interest in psychiatry after all. "I listened carefully, and what went through my mind surprised me," she said of her now-shelved interview with Simpson. "Mental illness. Thought-process disorder. No empathy. Malignant narcissism." Kind of what went through my mind when I heard that Judith Regan was behind this debacle.
Wow. Vicious stuff. And I definitely mean that in a good way.

6 Comments:

At November 22, 2006 at 9:40:00 AM EST, Blogger mike_b1 said...

Funny hed, and my guess is you wouldn't know why: A former major league pitcher named Phil Regan was nicknamed "The Vulture" (because he often entered games in relief and picked up easy wins).

 
At November 22, 2006 at 9:49:00 AM EST, Blogger Dan Kennedy said...

Mike: I remember "The Vulture," but I wouldn't have if you hadn't reminded me. Bob Stanley was known as "The Vulture" for a while, too.

 
At November 22, 2006 at 11:07:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Always interesting when two pedantic people meet, each considering (her)self smarter than the other. Judging from the Amazon reviews, Eileen should have stuck with Judith. They deserve each other.

 
At November 22, 2006 at 12:33:00 PM EST, Blogger Dan Kennedy said...

Aaron: You are correct, sir.

 
At November 22, 2006 at 1:02:00 PM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Since most editors got to be that by first being good writers, it is at least possible that editor was indeed as smart as she thought. I just found it funny that EMac wanted to write about a sordid subject without getting her hands dirty, only to do the "Inspector Renaud" routine when she verified what a sleaze Regan was. Now, from the highest ground in Wellesley, she pontificates on the ink-stained wretches below. Methinks (s)he doth protest too much.

 
At November 23, 2006 at 12:52:00 AM EST, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Rick,

I'm assuming someone from Duxbury calling someone from Wellesley elitist is meant to be ironic.

Still, someone who's spewed as much disdain for your fellow man as you have might be better off keeping your mouth shut. Methinks.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home